this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2026
128 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31714 readers
3798 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman has lost his unique leverage in Washington now that his party has pulled off a blue wave in the midterm elections.

The Democratic Party was handed control of the House and the Senate on Tuesday, dramatically reshaping Congress for the country.

In Pennsylvania, Fetterman has wielded the power of being the deciding vote in what was a narrowly divided Senate, as a Democrat willing to break with his party. But Democratic Senate gains across the country on Tuesday have pushed their seats from a minority of 47 to a majority of at least 54, after flipping at least seven seats, as of early Wednesday morning.

This means Fetterman, who has long faced criticism from wings of his party for obstructing the Democratic agenda by voting with Republicans, will now have less power to force his party to listen to the views he represents.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 44 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Lot of bummer headlines lately. This one really feels good.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 17 points 52 minutes ago (1 children)

Hopefully we get a handful more good ones in the near future.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 5 points 34 minutes ago

The stuff that is going to start surfacing will turn out stomachs, but we need to power through it to rub some right wing noses in the poop they were willing to overlook to pwn the libs

(This is such a terribly written sentence you can rest assured I am a real person)

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 13 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

to force his party to listen to the views he represents.

Dropped the ball at the end there. That's the whole problem, he doesn't represent the people who got him in there.

[–] 13igtyme@startrek.website 2 points 26 minutes ago

He's not representing the people that elected him. He's representing his views. Article still technically correct.

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 19 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

I've never voted in a primary before, but in 2028 I will be looking into that.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 11 points 29 minutes ago

Just FYI primaries are more impactful to vote in than general elections.

[–] 13igtyme@startrek.website 2 points 49 minutes ago (5 children)

Why have you never voted in a primary?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 14 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

Let's not blame people looking to change, but embrace them. Primaries are how we move the party to the left.

Last night was great progress towards damage control. Now we can start fixing things in the primaries.

[–] 13igtyme@startrek.website 5 points 43 minutes ago (1 children)

Where do you see blame in my question? It's an honest question.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 34 minutes ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago)

My comment was more intended to keep people from dogpiling on your comment to drum up blame for Fetterman on those who didn't participate previously but have now seen the importance. Your intent almost certainly wasn't blame, but it could still nudge people in that direction, even if that wasn't your intent.

I was usually the first in line to yell at people for not participating in the primaries over the last few years, and I felt a slight itch to fall back into it, so it was more of a "let's celebrate a win and move forward together" comment than anything specific about the intent of your comment.

[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 11 points 46 minutes ago

Lots of people don't fuck with politics. But politics will always fuck with you.

Sounds like somebody who finally woke up. We have to participate in democracy for it to function.

[–] DonkeyStar@lemmy.world 4 points 32 minutes ago

My personal answer is that you have to register as a member of a party in my state, and I’m not fond of being on lists like that.

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 3 points 37 minutes ago

I usually don't know anything about candidates before the actual election starts ramping up. I'm usually voting against people rather than for them.

[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 3 points 39 minutes ago (1 children)

Might not have been old enough

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago

Nah, I'm old as Hell.

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.today 4 points 41 minutes ago

Good. Fuck that guy.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 34 minutes ago* (last edited 34 minutes ago)

I mean, we'll see.

I suspect the magic number to pass a bill in the Senate is going from 50 back to 60, again