this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
593 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

74461 readers
2372 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 52 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

All YouTube will be is just AI “creator” slop soon. People should be ditching that shit post-haste.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 14 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Before Google came along, most search engines were manually curated. I'm disappointed that nobody's had any success bringing that concept back. They always cave in and take the cheap route by trying to make the general public & algorithms rate things, which of course instantly gets gamed to uselessness.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago

Isn't this a bit disingenuous to why they originally started to change the algorithm though?

People figured it out and started abusing it by spinning up proxy websites that would just link to the sites they wanted higher up in the rankings. You could argue Google only became an advertising company so that they could regulate that whilst also taking a slice.

I'm not arguing that they've since lost their way though.

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

These two comments read like Dejá-vu…

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

The pagerank algorithm worked fine for many years in the 2000-2010s before google transitioned into a full time advertising company

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago

It was sooooo good in retrospect.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 22 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Aw, don't you love searching for an update on something just for the algorithm to show you a low view count video that's a mediocre computer voice talking over a barely related slideshow?

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Oh absolutely. And it’s one of the same 3 or 4 voices in every video. And not only that, but a lot of the videos themselves are AI. Check the comments… yeah. No one notices or even cares.

It’s a foregone conclusion at this point. AI going to absolutely wreck the creativity of mankind. Art will be viewed in history books, and it’s fucking sad.

[–] quid_pro_joe@infosec.pub 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I would recommend going to some local art faires, it will soothe your anxiety about the future (of art). I bought a small oil-on-canvas painting of a sailboat at sunset from a young artist at a recent art faire, who was thrilled to talk about art and even tried to give me the painting for free. Creating art by hand is soul-satisfying, and rest assured, my friend, it will never be replaced my AI.

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago

God I hope you’re right. We create such beautiful things. I’d hate to see humanity become so hollow that we stoop to accepting AI slop as art.

[–] Ofiuco@piefed.ca 25 points 20 hours ago (14 children)

So I am completely ignorant about this, but... Would just hosting torrents to their own content work? I know the revenue might not be the same, but, would it be possible to keep it going around?

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yea, revenue certainly wouldn't be the same. As in, there would be no revenue.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Ad revenue. They'd still get sales through their store, as well as sponsor revenue.

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 5 points 11 hours ago

When I worked with an influencer who made free workout vids, his entire revenue was 80% of income. It was an extreme minority from free videos to buying something in his store.

Then some algorithm change in 2018 broke his entire income, he couldn't afford me, and last I checked, he was sponsored by diet pills or whatever fake garbage.

It's a damn shame because his dream was always to provide free workout vids.

[–] Jeffool@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

People with enough of a viewership would still be offered sponsorship for videos. Like YouTubers who do their own ads in videos.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago

Easier than that. Just put it on peertube

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 22 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (7 children)

So, there are options.

You have three challenges:

  • You need to be discoverable

  • you need to be accessible

  • you need to monetize

If you just make videos and torrent them, you're not monetized, you're not discoverable and you're not really very accessable to the average person.

Youtube is this nifty one-stop-shop that provides all three to a certain point.

Peertube gives you some discoverability and lots of accessibility, but nothing for monetization.

Odysee gives you a tiny bit of discoverability and lots of accessibility, but almost nothing for monetization.

Floatplane (assuming GN wasn't feuding with LMG) gives you reasonable monetization and accessibility but almost nothing in discoverability.

edit: cut myself short

I'd like to see some form of partially federated system that works with peertube. I think the platform could scale and we could give youtube a run for their money.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›