ValueSubtracted

joined 2 years ago
 

The agreement stresses that this pipeline will be privately constructed and financed — unlike the publicly owned Trans Mountain — and the intention is to have some Indigenous co-ownership.

That ["project of 'national interest'"] designation means the pipeline — and possibly the tankers associated with transporting the oil — could be exempted from some federal laws. Those include the Fisheries Act, the Species At Risk Act and the Impact Assessment Act, among others.

Canada is committing to "collaborate with Alberta to provide a clear and efficient approval process for the Alberta bitumen pipeline."

Importantly, Alberta is promising to "collaborate with B.C. to ensure British Columbians share substantial economic and financial benefits of the proposed pipeline."

Ottawa will also suspend the proposed federal oil and gas emissions cap and Alberta's requirements under the Clean Electricity Regulations (CER).

But the two sides are committed to increasing the industrial carbon price in the province — moving it from $95 a tonne now to a minimum of $130 a tonne. The federal government had previously demanded that price rise to $170 a tonne by 2030.

Both sides say they are committed to net-zero by 2050, despite the MOU that has the potential to turbocharge conventional energy production.

To help achieve that goal, both Canada and Alberta are moving ahead with Pathways Plus, an Alberta-based carbon capture, utilization and storage project, which could reduce the emissions intensity of exports from the province's oilsands.

The two sides are also agreeing to dramatically lower methane emissions associated with the oil patch — a 75 per cent reduction target relative to 2014 emissions levels by 2035.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 4 points 6 months ago (12 children)

If you have additional information that contradicts it, I'd happy to see it. I don't live in Quebec, and only know what I know.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Deadline is actually an American Hollywood/entertainment industry trade outlet, so it's definitely not a Canadian thing.

Weird metaphor to have in your style guide, though.

No, it says Canadian "beer" killed him. It's an immediate signal that it wasn't actually beer.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 11 points 6 months ago (3 children)

...not all low-income people are homeless?

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 20 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I don't think I'd call it a "catch".

Carney said that Canadians who fail to file a return when they earn under the basic personal amount means Canadians “who most need benefits often don’t get them.”

Those benefits include the GST/HST tax credit, the Canada child benefit, the Canada workers benefit, the Canadian disability benefit and the disability tax credit.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 43 points 6 months ago (20 children)

*for low-income citizens who earn less than the basic personal amount

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I agree, but...legally speaking*, I think they have a decent case?

*I'm not a lawyer, just your standard online idiot

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

we don’t have the technology or the expertise to perform the procedure here

I would say this is the part that's unreasonable. Being the only G7 country unable to perform proton beam treatments isn't exactly a point of pride.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's definitely a case of NORAD working as designed. Which is good!

The fact that we're borderline amazed that it's working as designed is much less good.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, the most imminent air threat has historically been over the pole, which is why CFB Cold Lake exists.

The squadrons on Vancouver Island are for surveillance and search-and-rescue, which is entirely sensible for the coast.

view more: ‹ prev next ›