politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
A third of democrats identify as democratic socialists, start figuring out how to court them instead of republican voters or keep losing.
2-5: I don’t care about any of that shit, and basing the candidate on it is brain dead and condescending as fuck as far as speaking to the interests of the average person right now go. Oooh, loook, we got the tall white military man! You like the tall white military man with 2.5 children, yes? Don’t worry, he won’t make sure you get healthcare! Why aren’t more of you voting for him?!
Centrists will simultaneously tell you no issues matter to real voters except the economy (and maybe a few Republican coded issues) and also that those people actually care overwhelmingly about whether their representatives have a penis.
"Whether you could die if AI takes your job? No one cares about that! Whether there are boobs in that suit? Unacceptable!"
After the Romer interview with Fox News, the 1/3 number might drop. Democrats will keep losing if they can't expand beyond their base.
You don't care but others do. The goal is to win as many voters as possible. Jon Ossoff and Andy Beshear would make better Democratic presidential candidates. Beshear is governor of a red state. Ossoff is a senator from a swing state. This means they can attract voters outside the Democratic base.
Maybe figure out how to get current Democrats to show up before deciding you know how to get new blood, too. 🙄
It's inherent to the centrist brainrot that Democrats should care more about gaining Republican votes than figure out why their own voters aren't turning out. They don't want a candidate who expands the coalition with new blood in the form of young people and disillusioned city dwellers. They want to chase Republican unicorns.
Find a good candidate and voters will show up. Jon Ossoff and Andy Beshear will make good Democratic presidential candidates.
You keep asserting it, but have offered nothing to back it up. The only electable (as in, can legally be elected) Democrat more popular than AOC is ~~Bernie Sanders~~ E: forgot he's not even a Democrat, so there isn't one more popular than AOC. And Kamala Harris is tied with her (but dropping in popularity). https://yougov.com/en-us/ratings/politicians Jon Ossof is tied with Tulsi Gabbard for popularity, for what that tells you. Beshear is even less popular.
Why do you want to run less popular candidates?
While I agree with you, I think you overestimate the depth of interest of the average American. "Swing voters" who sway each election tend to be especially more superficial than the average - they are the biggest problem.
Barrack Hussein Obama won the largest victory of any recent president. It's not the demographics that sway those superficial voters.
The existence of a swing state in a nationwide election is, itself, the problem. The electoral college needs to go. We've already dismantled the anti-democratic vision of the founders so much (people other than land owning white men above the age of 21 vote now, obviously) that it doesn't make sense to just leave some anti-democratic measures in.