this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
938 points (94.8% liked)

Political Memes

12520 readers
2871 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

literally every time someone is like 'woe is me the tankies got me, all i did was speak truth to power' i look at the modlog and it's them insulting people or being a reactionary

[–] sharps89@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only insult is your support of Putin and Stalin.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

oh yeah i almost forgot, making up wild accusations is another thing i see in the modlogs

[–] sharps89@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So we're in agreement that one should not be banned for expressing a negative opinion of the USSR?

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there's plenty of criticism of the USSR, Stalin, Putin in these spaces.

people who are lazily ragebaiting and accusing people of being mossad for criticism of the US prison-industrial complex do get banned though

[–] sharps89@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Criticism of the USSR, Stalin, and Putin is deleted in ml instances. My deletion history proves it.

The representation was inaccurate, as 80% of the 1996 US figure quoted were on probation, not incarcerated.

It's not lazy ragebaiting to verify facts, is it?

And since you're such an expert, which Lemmy user in particular, was insulted? Why is the mere assertion that one works on behalf of an intelligence service considered an insult by a disinterested observer?

[–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Your deletion history proves that calling people "mossad psyops" while angrily flailing like a toddler gets you banned. The very same thread has plenty of others (attempting to) critique the Soviet Union without being banned.

This is like saying I got banned for arguing against racism on whatever instance that fucked up phrenology thread was at, while I in actuality got banned for being kind of rude.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

... you realize parole is still part of the carceral state right

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago

Oh wow it's that guy lmao.

[–] sharps89@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probation is distinct from parole in the US legal system. Shall I provide you with a source to clarify the difference?

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

typo on my part, the point is the same. both are still parts of the carceral state.

that the US has got better at managing more people through its carceral system with less visible imprisonment is not the flex that you think it is

[–] sharps89@lemmy.zip -4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Criticism of the US prison system is warranted but we must ensure that it is accurate, no?

It's strange to me that you think I'm flexing. Aren't we essentially arguing the same thing: that all humans have the right to live in decency?

[–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

It is accurate, you just struggle to actually read what is written.