this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
308 points (99.7% liked)

politics

27262 readers
2944 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Going ahead with the insurrection act means they're planning to have the army massacre us.

Archived copies of the article

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 89 points 5 days ago (5 children)

They're already spread thin in MN, this will only make that worse. They're already desperate to fill their ranks with enough bodies, this will only make that worse.

ICE is currently, and is likely to remain, susceptible to infiltration by resistors.

Any able-bodied people who are interested in offering non-violent resistance to preserve democracy should consider whether they're willing to exploit this opportunity.

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 43 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Thinking that ICE's collapse is a forgone conclusion seems dangerous given how quickly they're filling their ranks, and because of how much they are improving their strategies in the Minnesota demo. We should all be on the same page and understand that ICE's power will flourish and their strategies will be refined in coming months. It's time to prepare for a future in which ICE is successful, not cling to the hope that ICE is somehow doomed to fail.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

ICE is not doomed to fail. But they and this regime will be their most vulnerable in these early stages. A swift, coordinated resistance is required to make the most of this time.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The economy is getting worse and the bonuses ICE offers start to look better and better. People will get desperate.

[–] RustyShackleford@piefed.social 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

ICE is an obvious attempt by the government to get ICE agents killed by democrats. Essentially fishing bait for a revolution.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

It's not just that. It's also a terror tactic and a flaunt of their power. If we fight back, they fight back harder. If we don't fight back, their revolution succeeds without a drop of blood being spilled. Don't accept their tyranny out of fear of retaliation. The regime will claim we're revolting at their leisure, regardless of what we do.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I see that as a good thing. People who are just in it for the money are more likely to resist, especially if they realize there are more of them than the ones doing it for the love of the game.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Join ice and do as little work as possible and preferably sabotage efforts?

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

This is what real non-violent resistance looks like

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How many people that are progressive or liberal or you know not right wing and are low-key infiltrating ice right now for the greater good? I like the idea of like Robin Hooding from the inside but to see all that brutality up close firsthand would probably make my stomach sick, even if I don’t engage in it myself.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

How many people that are progressive or liberal or you know not right wing and are low-key infiltrating ice right now for the greater good?

Zero ;)

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Aren't they offering something like 20K or 30K just for fucking signing up?

At the same time the Taco economy is fucking up everyone's livelihood?

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How many of those sign-up bonuses do think will actually get paid out?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No idea, but people that are in dire circumstances due to Taco fucking over the economy are not likely to ask many questions.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 3 points 4 days ago

The people who have issue with reading the fine print on a contract aren't either

[–] Headofthebored@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I believe you have to be employed for quite a while before they pay the bonus out, (if they ever do)

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Dangling tens of thousands of dollars in benefits for making brutalizing minorities your job is going to work miracles in a country where many people would do it for free.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

In a vacuum, I'd agree with you. But the recent increase in recruitment effort and decrease in recruit screening would seem to suggest otherwise.

Even if you don't get selected or want to join, every moment they spend processing bogus applications is a moment they can't spend processing legitimate ones. You can resist by simply bogging down the system with AI-generated fake resumes.