this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
390 points (99.7% liked)

politics

28830 readers
2275 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lividweasel@lemmy.world 133 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Isn’t this exactly the type of situation that was being used recently as an example of when an order is so blatantly illegal that the soldier is required not to follow it?

[–] ferrule@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 months ago

and pointing out that it's an illegal order is aparently unamerican

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

And all the good little soldiers followed the order anyway.

But I always hear from ex-military how it is drilled into their heads not to do this stuff etc and that they would never yadda yadda. Push comes to shove and they willingly commit war crimes time and time again.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It seems that all those good soldiers who bravely defy orders in the name of American values only exist in propaganda content

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Because it comes down to the Presidential pardon powers. They can defy a blatantly illegal order, be dishonorably discharged, lose their pensions, healthcare benefits, pay, etc. or, they can follow a blatantly illegal order, and receive a pardon for it later.

I ask you, which one would you pick?

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

There is zero evidence there was any push or shove.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 76 points 3 months ago (5 children)

When two survivors emerged from the wreckage, a Special Operations commander overseeing the attack ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth’s instructions to “kill everybody,” according to The Washington Post, citing officials with direct knowledge of the operation.

The two men were then “blown apart in the water,” according to the report.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 months ago

This guy needs to be blown apart, or maybe slowly with tiny cuts

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It makes me nauseous that my government is responsible for this senseless horror. The military can make no claim to honor when they bomb unarmed men clinging desperately to the burning wreck of the boat that was already illegally bombed.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 3 months ago

The military can make no claim to honor

Never could.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We need make sure those that then carried out that order are jailed as well.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I expect they'll be preemptively pardoned.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 14 points 3 months ago

What's another war crime for these people? Tuesday?

[–] thagoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Such a manly man. Nothing screams "I'm a super serious, super macho, super secure guy!" like summoning all the top generals for a dick waving ceremony, and bombing fishermen from airplanes.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 23 points 3 months ago

Bombing 3rd world fisherman from the highest tech airplanes in existence*

Ftfy

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He has all the energy of every omnivore that eats meat performatively once they learn they are in the presence of a vegetarian.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

I’m sensing some unresolved issues irrelevant to the current situation at play in your comment…

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Can't wait for Trump to go away so we can jail this fucker for murder.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

Yeah he didn't get illegal orders, he gave illegal orders and unless Trump is going to say "everyone in my administration is pardoned of all acts performed during their time in my administration" he is clearly guilty of ordering people to be murdered without any due process.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh you sweet summer child.

Even when Trump dies, there is somebody much worse waiting in the wings. 2028 is not going to be a salvation.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It very much is a threat to all of us.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

Go doom about it

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

They well all have presidential Parsons so nothing well happen.

[–] marv99@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago

.. fuckers ..

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Like Obama's drone strikes?

Fucking please.

You guys have been worshipping senseless killing for decades. And NOW you want to jail them for murder? A little too late, ain't it?

[–] syreus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

What if the same people disgusted with these killings were also disgusted with the drone strikes done under Obama? Crazy to consider. Better to make a strawman with a glaring hypocrisy.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 31 points 3 months ago

So I guess whenever he steps foot on European soil he will be immediately captured and go to trial, right?

RIGHT‽

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 months ago

Can't have any survivors, they know they could be unequivocally confirmed to not be related to the drug trafficking.

There is no other possible motive here. If these were actual criminals they would parade them about.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 18 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Still don't see why it's necessary to blow up a drug boat in the first place let alone kill everyone on board.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because they’re not drug boats. They’re alleged drug boats. But “innocent until proven guilty” doesn’t fit the project 2025 agenda.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Cruelty. That's the answer.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

it's a bad idea but I think they think it's a strong deterrent. "You try to traffic drugs here - you will die" sort of mentality

This obviously is a poor strategy for a dozen of other reasons but they are simple, stupid people so to them simple stupid solutions are very attractive especially if it scratches their need for cruelty and racial superiority.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 months ago

He should be extradited to every country he attacked.

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

God. This fuckin guy. Another 12 year old in an adult's body. His parents should be ashamed for raising such a piece of human trash.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 months ago

You're in luck! There is a letter from his mother to him that expresses, among many things lol, extreme shame for him and how he is.

Just search "full text email from hegseth's mother" and choose your flavor

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 3 months ago

Kill everybody; starting with Pete Hegseth.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 10 points 3 months ago

Reminder to all the people newly against extrajudicial killing of random people: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Targeted_killing#North_America

[–] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

Is there already a case against him and the Trump administration at the ICC? If not, does anyone know how to start one?

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago

Dead men can't defend themselves or provide evidence that he's wrong.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

Awful however now even worse with Trump pardoning a real, not imagined, drug lord. Death without trial (or evidence) for potential and most likely poor drug runners but freedom for a convicted drug lord because he could pay Trump off.

[–] EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago

Disgusting.

[–] notsure@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

...the winners write history, especially with no survivors...or witnesses...