823
Which is a violation of his oath of office, which is ample grounds for impeachment.
Shame that Congress is full of feckless cowards
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
823 points (99.6% liked)
politics
27280 readers
2424 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"Hey buddy, get in line." - the other 10-15 things he's done that other presidents would have gotten impeached for.
What's crazy is Trump has already been impeached! TWICE!
And found guilty of 34 felonies and (in a civil case) raping a woman.
God damn. I love Star Wars, but why is Star Wars almost a documentary these days? Between this, Obi-Wan’s speech about the fall of the temple, and the events of Attack of the Clones…we just don’t have spaceships.
Watching the prequels in the current year made me appreciate just a little bit how... so forward thinking they were. Emperor Palatine didn't become an emperor overnights, you see, he was made into a Chancellor democratically and then he just... played chess against himself to eventually become Emperor.
Granted the modern breed of fash spreading all over the world aren't that horrifically smart, but it's true.
This is how liberty dies!
Isn’t Palpatine just a re-telling of Hitler’s rise to power.
Also storm trooper are just stormtroopers and most of the rest of it is WW2 in space.
I thought I'd heard it (at least the original) was based on the Vietnam war, with the US inspiring the empire.
But Palpatine doesn't really feature until far later, so it may well be a mix.
Edit: https://screenrant.com/star-wars-george-lucas-vietnam-war-inspiration-explainer/ is a start.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The political things that happen in Star Wars have happened in our real life history, often more than once. It's not that Star Wars is starting to sound like a documentary, it's just that we're repeating the same stupid, short sighted, errors that those movies took inspiration from.
The fact that even the vast, legendary popularity of Star Wars hasn't helped in that regard kind of makes me question the ability of fiction to make an impact in society's way of thinking, sad as that is to consider
If anything, that might be a low estimate
I dont think theyre cowards per se. I think this is how the "democracy" is intended to work?
Trump looks after oligarchs, oligarchs make donations to campaigns to get senators elected, senators support Trump.
Its not so much that theyre cowards, theyre just serving the people who got them elected, and thats not the voters.
Cool. What of it then? I get it, but it doesn’t really mean anything if accountability is optional nowadays.
So the grants must be reinstated.
They’ll just appeal it to the supreme court who will rule that actually it’s totally cool
The absolute least we can do is force them to jump through the hoops. Like, I get that it feels pointless but it's better than just giving up and letting them do whatever they want.
They WANT you to feel like there's no point so that you'll give up. They want you to give up because that's the easiest way for them to win. Why give them the satisfaction? They haven't actually won yet, but even if I can never win I'll won't give up no matter how impossible the victory, and neither should you.
Also it helps build up a solid case if shit goes to civil war, easier to get international aid if the list of things the feds have done is long and itemized. Also helps justify it to the population both within and without such anti trump territory.
So we should give up, dig a hole and stick your heads in? I'm not a giving up sort of person. But if that's your preference, go for it. smh
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Not an american but is the famous american "checks and balances" need to be turned off and on again or smt? It doesn't seem to be working.
I'm American and I'm not convinced it was ever turned on. Pretty sure it was theorized and marketed well and all of you believed it as much as we did.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Checks and balances is working exactly as the founding fathers envisioned.
...by cashing checks and hoarding balances.
The founders were mostly slave/land owning robber barons. Washington was one of the most wealthiest people in the colonies…
Yeah the only reason they didn't want to remain a colony was because they thought they could become more wealthy personally breaking off from the British empire, seizing more land from the natives, and taking more land from Britain's other colony of Canada.
Then bind all the states and their settlers and natives by saddling them with national debt to lock them into a unfettered capitalist experiment on an unexploited resource rich land with the moral framework of civilising and subsuming the native population.
It's definitely not working now. It got destroyed after 9/11 - Bush was only too happy about the opportunity to make some changes that had already been waiting in a drawer for who knows how many years - and it's honestly a miracle it took so long for someone to exploit its absence to its fullest extent.
But arguably it all went downhill long before Bush.
The "checks and balances" depend on putting ambitious people in different parts of the government, and giving them competing roles. Then, naturally, excesses get curbed because no one part of the government would want to cede too much of its power to the other.
It did not forsee a future where the leaders of the other co-equal branches of government would subjugate themselves to the President's ego.
load more comments
(2 replies)
315 grants were terminated in October, ending support for 223 projects worth approximately $7.5 billion,
Deciding that the government had violated grantees’ rights to equal protection, Mehta only ordered a return to the status quo, reinstating seven grants totaling $27.6 million.
Let's be clear, that's $27.6 million out of $7,500 million. 99.6% of the cuts still go through.
Yeah, from the article, it sounds like only a few organizations were in the lawsuit. They're the only ones the judge ordered restored.
He commits crimes against the constitution every day. Is something going to be done about it?
The politicians sure as fuck aren’t doing anything. Maybe a post on social media or a 5 second statement on the news. That’s it. Nothing else. They are making money off this and can advance their agendas. They don’t give a fuck about America or its people.
As other countries in the world showed in recent years, constitutions are worthless pieces of paper.
And some like Brazil and South Korea showed that constitutions were law
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Amazing. I cant wait to see what the consequences are.
I've under taken the arduous trip and located the answer. To save you the trouble, I've drawn a map.
load more comments
(7 replies)
Incoming Truth Social post....
"This PROVES that Demonrat states are run by crooks, because only criminals use the Fifth Amendment!"
load more comments
(1 replies)
Trump, "What do you mean 'ammendment'? Where are you getting this? Nobody has heard of these ammendments you're talking about...."
Ammendment is when u edit a twitter
MFW people say the Democrats are “tearing this country apart”
I wish the media stop addressing him as President for the rest of his term he only cares about his ego and white supremacy. Trump has show something being illegal doesn't matter if you just don't care.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Trump's violated so many laws and under aged women and got no consequences so why would he stop?
It would probably be a shorter article to list the amendments he hasn't violated!
load more comments
(1 replies)
"Not my president" because he refuses to be.
"Wait, I know the 5th Amendment! That's an important one! That's the one that says I don't have to admit to my crimes! I'm the best in the world at that one!"
"It's my favorite Bible verse!"
Probably the most concise summary of modern Christianity we're ever going to get.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›