this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
194 points (97.5% liked)

politics

28858 readers
1942 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thehowlingnorth@lemmy.ca 83 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's like fucking Putin and the Superbowl ring.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What…? Didn’t know about this. Need to search web

Holy shit. What a piece of work…

[–] ryokimball@infosec.pub 13 points 1 month ago

... I had forgotten about that.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Someone gave putin a superbowl ring? Is putin an american football fan?

[–] parody@lemmings.world 15 points 1 month ago

He stoles its from us

He was allegedly being shown the ring when he simply walked it out of the room and didn’t return

Allegedly (wasn’t there myself)

[–] ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works 75 points 1 month ago
[–] Australis13@fedia.io 63 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I honestly don't know how the Onion is going to beat this.

Heck, I don't know if future students of history are actually going to be able to believe the history books about this decade, should they be written with any sort of accuracy... Reality's jumped the shark.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Of course they will. Political leaders in the past have done many many bizarre things.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It means nothing because it can’t be given to anyone other than whose won it. Like you can’t give the medal of freedom to Oscar the Grouch.

[–] goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We really should, though. Dude needs a win.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He helped teach the world to read, if Oscar doesn’t deserve it who does?

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago

I would. Oscar's the freeest muppet, he lives by his own rules. (And his garbage can is bigger on the inside, so that includes the laws of physics)

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

JFC, how pathetic this guy is.

That's not how medals work, asshole.

Who would have thought a guy practically in the Silent Generation would have pined for a participation trophy? Such a loser.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not even a participation trophy. I have recieved exactly 1 trophy in my life. It was a 1992 participation trophy for playing 1st grade basketball as mandated by the school.

But I DID play the season of basketball. I DID participste.

Show me where trump has participated in acts that promote peace.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Say what you will about participation awards, but at least their recipients actually participated in the activity in question. I don't know what this is.

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 16 points 1 month ago

It's a bribe.

[–] mrmacduggan@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I theorize he is trying to get into heaven (???) and he might believe that the only thing that could cancel out all his sins is to become the Nobel Peace Prize winner (???) through violence (???)

None of this makes any sense if you don't have severe dementia.

[–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

It is because Obama got it before. It is not that deep

[–] goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well boy howdy, do I sure hope he gets to test that hypothetical assumption real soon.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

~~Participation award.~~

Bribe

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 month ago

haha oh man what a loser

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Trump discovers a new level of loserdom daily.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 month ago

And now he has no use for her. Goodbye.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 23 points 1 month ago

This is more pathetic than getting sports trophies off of Freecycle and claiming you "won" all of them. What a pedophile loser!

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Donny, i understand you. I once bought myself a #1 dad mug at the thrift shop. i don’t even have kids.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

lol. It actually happened?

What the fuck is this timeline?

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Well that thing is null and void now

[–] mrmacduggan@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I feel like her sacrificial decision to give him this (ultimately meaningless) symbolic token in exchange for the potential of peace for her country is showing why she deserved the Peace Prize in the first place. If handing it over makes Trump chill the hell out about working with Venezuela's succession, it will have been worth it.

(This situation is obviously batshit insane and it's pathetic that he's extorting her, but at least she's trying to use all her resources available to manipulate this mad king and sue for peace - if this Nobel Prize was driving his hatred, it's best to sacrifice it I guess. Especially since the actual honor is non-transferrable LMAO)

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Or she's just selling out and kissing ass in hopes that the invaders will install her as a puppet and grant her money and power.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hector@lemmy.today 19 points 1 month ago

This is not pathetic at all.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought right-wingers hated participation trophies for all kids, even the dregs. Hypocrite.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

C’mon, boomers. Lecture us about participation trophies again.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm sure this was a difficult choice.

It's basically this, and hope that it buys enough goodwill with Trump to let you take over the government there, or you keep it and let the US operate the government as a puppet state.

Ultimately, if this pays off, the medal is a pretty cheap price to pay all things considered

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The medal doesn't even mean anything. It's like buying a purple heart at an auction; doesn't make you a veteran. Of course, Trump would never understand that.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

It's a gold trinket. Everyone has clued in this is what you do with Trump.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Be a puppet state either way, she just wants to signal that she'd be an enthusiastic puppet.

Her entire legitimacy at this point consists of being recognized by Western organizations and now grovelling to a hostile foreign power. She'd be the worst type of puppet.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Should have made a fake one with a little radioactive bit inside.

I mean who would check ?

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Airport security would detect that. Radio-isotope poisoning is a favorite of the Russians, I'm sure the White house has multiple layers of detection set up for exactly that kind of thing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Donnie wins the biggest boy prize.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

can it be revoked?

eta: I did the google and apparently it can't be revoked, but I'm sure history will award it an asterisk.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 month ago

It's not his. He's just proud to be holding onto someone else's award. Which is somehow the most pathetic thing I think I've ever heard. It's like being a cuck for the actual holder.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

It's not transferrable. He gets the gold trinket, that's it.

[–] mrmacduggan@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It can't be revoked or transferred, he just has the physical token. He's an idiot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aarRJaay@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

He can put it next to his "World's Greatest Dad" mug which I'm sure he thinks is real, valid and earned rather than something to soothe his fragile ego

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The Nobel organization should rescind her award and give it to someone else. Now he just has a gold necklace and not an official Nobel Prize.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›