this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
858 points (99.0% liked)

memes

21045 readers
2108 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ytg@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

Doing this sort of work has convinced me that the parallel postulate is a lie

[–] Karmanopoly@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

I'd like to see AI miss work because it's Grandma died... Again

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I mean.... it absolutely will get it wrong.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Ai "always incorrect"

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Having a whole in your roof is a classic construction gotcha.

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

At least Ai will say sorry you are right, I pulled the measurements out of my ass

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Good luck trying to emulate a dumbass, dumbass.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 32 points 18 hours ago (5 children)
[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

You're right to push back! I removed your lung, not your appendix.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

It doesn't even have to measure it first!

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 7 points 16 hours ago

You're absolutely right...

[–] Pman@lemmy.org 2 points 14 hours ago

The most tragic and obvious version of AI already doing that is the school that was bombed in Iran due to AI messing up at best.

[–] how_we_burned@lemmy.zip 4 points 17 hours ago

It does my head in how we ignore the shit answers language models give (I refuse to call them intelligent).

I swear unless it's baby shit, like where is the syntax error in this script, it almost always gets it wrong.

Making fresh scripts, even with padentic level prompting and detail just ends up with a script with multiple errors.

I've realised I would have written it just as quickly (after all the iteration work) if I had just done it myself.

The only I find LLMS are good for are glorified search engines. And even then it's horrifying how inefficient chatgpt is for search compared to say Google.

Not to mention it's run by a sociopath.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 114 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What are you talking about? They will measure it wrong 3 times, cut it wrong while saying it's correct.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 3 points 5 hours ago

Technically, it'll say it measured 3 times, when really it just found a number that someone on Reddit said they measured 3 times 10 years ago, and used that.

[–] Ariselas@piefed.ca 5 points 14 hours ago

Damn it, I didn't know AI was that good already

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They will measure it wrong 3 times, cut it wrong while saying it’s correct.

Are we talking about the AI or the contractor?

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 10 points 22 hours ago

Both. Technically all three.

  1. The general purpose AI unsuited to the task.
  2. The untrained contractor directing the AI.
  3. The soulless profit-bot AI that manages the contractor.
[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

That's literally what they do lol

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then try to fill the space with glue, to then conclude it needs to wipe everything and start over, removing the earth in the progress

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

just ignore the massive pile of fixodent in my garage that used to be a car

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 20 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Have you seen AI with numbers? It doesn’t calculate, it just trying to give a statistically-likely answer (just like it does for every other next-word in its answer).

Some of them have to drop back to deterministic software tools (and even then sometimes they’re called with incorrect parameters because “intent” lol)

AI already emulates dumbasses it just got no legs. Don’t worry though, soon they’ll give it legs and guns. Nothing can go wrong guys. trust me bro the future is now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

I feel like that's what AI specializes in

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

AI does it five times, in my experience.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

correction: it claimed to do it 5 times. (it did 0 times)

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

3 times, sir.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I assure you it can give you three different measurements from the same picture then go on to explain why it’s okay to eat the plywood.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago

I can see AI measuring something 3 times and cutting it wrong, more than I can see AI measuring things once and cutting it right.

[–] Bleys@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Meanwhile ChatGPT setting a timer:

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd like to see AI change blinker fluid or bring the foreman a bucket of steam

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wouldn't even know where to find a left handed screw driver

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Or the board stretcher.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 5 points 23 hours ago

My favorite is having the new guy hold a bucket behind someone else using a grinder, to collect sparks for the spark plugs.

So nonsensical and yet so many people fall for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

this is like my new favorite wikipedia article, the examples are so funny https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fool%27s_errand

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (7 children)

The only thing hindering AI from taking 99% of the jobs is that robotic engineers still can't create a robot with the same level of dexterity as human hands.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Realistically, most jobs don't NEED hands. Most physical jobs can be done better with customized manipulators for the type of work being done.

We'd only need hands if we wanted a single robot model that could do multiple types of jobs, instead of a specific robot for each job.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

You ever worked in the trades? You need hands.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

i'd like to see ai measure something 3 times and get 4 different numbers

[–] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Can AI shit post on Lemmy while pretending to work? Didn't think so.

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Not Lemmy, but they do on Moltbook (Reddit but exclusive for agents).

moltbook - the front page of the agent internet - https://www.moltbook.com/

[–] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

You don't pay be to be busy 100% of the time, you pay be to be 100% busy sometimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

The problem is that you measured 3 times everyone knows you only measure twice and cut once

load more comments
view more: next ›