this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
1343 points (99.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

11624 readers
2568 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fleppensteijn@feddit.nl 13 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, "scanning errors", like when it's charging me full price instead of the discount that it was supposed to be on, which would not be as obvious if a cashier scanned it?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Zero training and zero pay. Hmm I wonder if anything could possibly go wrong…

[–] Phunter@lemmy.zip 1 points 33 minutes ago

You could pay yourself with free groceries. Or at least leave yourself a tip.

[–] calmblue75@lemmy.ml 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

And for some reason they were expected to tip the machine.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Would you like to round up for charity?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 38 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

They've been experimenting with self-checkouts for decades. When I was a kid, I remember being in a store with my grandma, waiting in line to pay, and an employee kept trying to entice those in the line to come over and try the self-checkouts.

She asked my grandma a few times before my grandma, a proud union supporter, snapped "I want a person to ring me up. I'm trying to save you're JOB, young lady!"

And the young woman stopped asking my grandma.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

trying to save you are job

[–] d5273@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

I'm a grammar proponent as well, but I'm not seeing the benefit of your comment. Do you think autocorrect errors are fun for anyone?

[–] gnawmon@ttrpg.network 11 points 18 hours ago

your grandma sounds like an awesome person

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 16 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I still don't get why you wouldn't get a discount for checking yourself out. No wonder all those high-falutin' CEO's think consumers are a bunch of dumb schmucks. The real heroes are the clerks who "miss" scanning something from time to time.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

I get a five finger discount now and then. Small things usually. I will NOT pay the bag fee if I self checkout, you took away a job for a computer, you can absolutely eat the 25-50 cents worth of bags.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Same reason they don’t pay you for using an atm instead of an expensive teller at an expensive branch

It’s easier To add a fee To a new service even if it’s to save them money, Than it is to start charging for an existing service that used to be central to their business

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Hey, it’s not my fault that a pack of T-bone steaks weighs the same as a pack of hot-dog wieners.

[–] ichwillhierraus@feddit.org 21 points 20 hours ago

I am not paid, i dont do the work.

Also, if the cashier makes a mistake, it is their peoblem. If you make it, they call you thief. Fuck them, i aint no cashier.

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 5 points 16 hours ago

In the local shop they often catch you for not scanning the paper bag.

But if you scan tomatoes as peppers or vice versa nobody bats an eye.

[–] texture@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago (36 children)

i dont even steal from these, i just prefer less interaction and faster checkout 🤷

[–] orb360@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 day ago (14 children)

If a cashier scans something incorrectly, its their mistake. If I scan something incorrectly, its theft. I'd rather not take on that liability.

[–] kossa@feddit.org 35 points 23 hours ago (6 children)

Depends on jurisdiction. In Germany, in order to qualify as theft, there needs to be intent. So just an error is not enough.

How to prove "intentional vs. not-intentional"? Easy: the whiter and richer you are, the more likely it is for you to convince everybody that it was a honest mistake ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

This is so it. If I make a mistake, I'd be sorry, I'd pay for it and that's it.

A friend of mine who works at the headquarters of a large local retailer keeps getting stopped by shop detectives of the same shop chain, even though he didn't do anything suspicious. Well, anything apart from being the son of parents from Afghanistan.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 1 points 44 minutes ago

I would pay for a mistake, but I wouldn't feel sorry. They want me to be perfect, but I'm just a customer, so no reason to feel bad if I type it on wrong.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] texture@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

i dont think ive ever scanned anything incorrectly. even if i did, it would have been a piece of fruit. in the case that anyone ever speaks to me about it in the future, i will just tell them "oh, oops" and then fix it. doesnt seem like much of a liability to me.

on the other hand, when i ring things through, you better believe i notice if a price is off, then i have them fix it if its higher than it should be and i say nothing if its lower. sounds like they are taking the liability as it were, which again i dont think is a serious factor.

[–] WillFord27@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Is it EVER lower? Every time in recent history that a price has been wrong for me, it's been wrong because they "forgot" to put a sale into the system. But you better be sure the old sales are wiped immediately. I imagine this is because they expire automatically, but there's a reason the system is made that way.

Hanlon's razor is reversed when dealing with multi-billion dollar corporations.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] jenings@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Watch out guys they might cut your shifts if this keeps up.

[–] HappyZed30@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Totally Company's fault. 😂

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 215 points 1 day ago (10 children)

It's not shoplifting, its an employee discount.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 132 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (20 children)

It is 1866. Stores are making record profits while complaining.
It is 1940. Stores are making record profits while complaining.
It is 2026. You get the picture.

[–] BossDj@piefed.social 4 points 16 hours ago

1920s - Corporation Genius idea: "self service groceries" - put the product out so people have to fetch the items themselves. Less employees, record profit! But no fairsies, stop stealing!

2000s - Corporate Genius idea: "self service checkout" - People scan their own products that they went and got from the shelves. Less employees, record profit! But no fairsies, stop stealing!

Solution? Tax the employees more to pay for police to protect our record profits!

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

This is bananas, and this is also bananas... It's odd that all this produce is bananas. Oh well, I'm not trained to tell the difference.

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Whoops! It seems that my finger has slipped and picked the cheapest variety of banana, out of the 11 varieties of bananas.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 1 day ago (33 children)

I’m gonna be so real, I prefer self-checkout whenever possible. The “employee discount” is just an occasional bonus

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 55 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Self-checkout or not, minimum wage is not even remotely enough to expect cashiers to be anti-theft enforcement.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dear Walmart, You owe me 4 weeks Vacation pay, and my annual raise. And where is my staff discount???

Sincerely, Customer

[–] db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You are responsible for applying the staff discount directly

[–] modus@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

I'm going to make official-looking stickers to say something like "Customer appreciation discount code: 4011." I'll put them on all the terminals.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (5 children)

A bunch of smaller places around me just totally shut down the self checkout. It's actually incredibly frustrating because there will be a line and I could just do it myself and be done. But no, everyone has to wait for a single cashier now because people were stealing. Just make up your mind. Get rid of it entirely or use it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›