this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
161 points (97.6% liked)

politics

30411 readers
2412 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 minutes ago

He should worry more about the ICC investigating him...

[–] diablicja@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 minutes ago
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

In other words, Pete Hegseth introduces mandatory gender-affirming tests as part of servicemember health evaluations.

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 39 points 2 hours ago

I just can’t. No one ever suspected that there were a group of people who could be so fucking brain dead and stupid that it would become some sort of superpower. Like the dumbest most inept motherfuckers. MAGA are pedophiles accomplices and idiots of the highest order.

[–] treehugger6@lemmy.world 108 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I thought Idiocracy was supposed to be a movie

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 19 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I fucking hate this comparison.

The government in Idiocracy actually tried. They were just idiots. The bad guy in that movie is stupidity.

When these comparisons started that wasn't even a fair comparison. And I mean like, it was common enough when W. was still in office, among the like 10 people who had seen it by that time.

We have actively malicious state actors who love that you're so willing to believe they're only stupid.

Also Mike Judge is terrified of poor people.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 3 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

Care to clue in those of us who aren't celebrity watchers, and know nothing about Mike Judge?

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 4 points 41 minutes ago (1 children)

Mike Judge is the creative mind behind Idiocracy, king of the hill, and office space. A core theme behind the first two is "poor people are stupid and crazy."

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 2 points 32 minutes ago

It's been a LONG time since I watched either of them, so I'll have to rewatch some with that perspective in mind. Seems a bit exaggerated to me, but I suppose it's possible. Thanks for explaining.

[–] Astronut@lemmy.zip 47 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The problem with fucking idiots is that they’re always fucking other fucking idiots and creating more fucken fucking idiots!

[–] voidsignal@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

They are rabbits. Incredibly stupid rabbits

[–] ryokimball@infosec.pub 76 points 3 hours ago

~~Forcing~~ Heavily recommending gender affirming care.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 66 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

All these old MAGAts and fuckfaces take testosterone supplements so fucken much. The old owner of the company I work at was one of these dudes. Its all about being s teenager forever.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 87 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

That sounds like gender affirming care. They should practice what they preach.

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 14 points 1 hour ago

Genuinely, it is gender affirming care. It's replacing sex hormones their body won't produce naturally, to counteract effects that are existentially devastating to their psyche.

They don't wanna say that low-T as an older man feels like gender dysphoria. But have a conversation with a trans guy and an old man about testosterone levels and masculinity and self-image, and you'll have almost the exact same complaint. "I just want to feel like the man I know I am inside."

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 33 points 3 hours ago

They will stare deadpanned directly into your eyes and tell you its somehow not.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 16 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

I don't see it that way. I see it as age denying care. They still want to be the "studs" they (thought) they were in high school. They're the same guys who wax nostalgically about their "glory days" when they were on the football team and how they "led the team to win the regionals" and they "coulda gone pro" but one of "those people" stole their scholarship.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Did they score 4 touchdowns in one game?

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

I'd much rather they were all shoe salesmen instead of running the Pentagon.

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 15 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

So they're affirming their desired gender ideal state?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 34 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

How the fuck is this not The Onion

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You could say that about 4-7 headlines per day

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blx@piefed.zip 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

My thoughts exactly. What next? Witch swimming?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Probably. Like, seriously.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 4 points 1 hour ago

This alcoholic power bottom wants to make sure all the men around him are as "manly" as possible.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 19 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

He seems to be obsessed with the purity of bodily fluids, just like Jack D. Ripper. Even looks a little like him.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You have to protect yourself that's why I only drink grain alcohol and rainwater.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

You ever see a Russky drink tapwater, Mandrake?

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Why would this matter other than Hegseth wanting to have gay orgies?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This guy has a micropenis, doesn't he?

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

Absolutely 1,000% without a doubt a 2.5in erect peen.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, let’s also pump them full of methamphetamine and we’ll create good little Sturmtruppens to do the füeher’s bidding.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

They already do for special forces.

[–] tea_n_typewriters@lemmy.world 17 points 3 hours ago

Prioritizing testosterone makes a lot of sense when you’re an anthropomorphic scrotum.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

Walking right up to the line of mandatoring "gender hormone therapy"...

While the screenings will be mandatory for eligible service members, Hegseth said that any resulting treatment would remain voluntary. "If treatment is recommended, it's entirely your choice to receive testosterone replacement therapy," he said.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Pete KegSith is a pussy and a moron. His wife would have to piss into the cup for him to pass the test.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago

Antivax is okay but they gotta give up blood to appease their master.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

Bro loves manly men.

[–] notsure@fedia.io 13 points 3 hours ago

...this is the onion, right? ..right?

[–] PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Seriously thought it was The Onion

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 hours ago

"Exclusive: Secretary of War, Pete Kegsbreath, has decreed that he will personally test the virility of our combat troops by physical examination."

[–] Rivermoonwolf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Assuming he's just asking for personal donations

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Is this to get rid of the women? *Or maybe to make the older soldiers "look better"?

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Wednesday that the Pentagon will begin requiring annual testosterone deficiency screenings for active-duty service members age 30 and older, saying the move is designed to improve military readiness and support long-term health.

While the screenings will be mandatory for eligible service members, Hegseth said that any resulting treatment would remain voluntary. "If treatment is recommended, it's entirely your choice to receive testosterone replacement therapy," he said.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know, but "testosterone replacement therapy" is most certainly gender-affirming care. But since they're not forcing it, I assume this is to institutionalize the bullying and harassment of men the testosterone-addled meatheads don't consider manly enough or women they consider too manly. And we can expect that to include routinely accusing those without the "right" amount of testosterone of being transgender and kicking them out of the military.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 hours ago

Wait, WHO is forcing hormones down our throat?

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 3 points 2 hours ago

the parody never ends

load more comments
view more: next ›